The concept of ‘spontaneous combustion’ has long stirred both fiction and history, with skepticism surrounding its validity.

Most scientists generally dismiss the phenomenon, arguing that even if it were extremely rare, it would likely be more widespread and occur in varied places and situations.

At the time, retired pathology professor Mike Green offered his thoughts on Faherty’s death and other instances of alleged ‘spontaneous combustion.’

Green suggested the term ‘spontaneous’ was misleading, believing there is always an ignition source, but it may get consumed in the fire, like a match or cigarette.

Speaking to the BBC, he explained, “There’s a source of ignition somewhere, but because the body is so thoroughly burned, it can’t be identified.”

Discussing similarities between Faherty’s case and others, he added, “This scenario is often reported. Even seasoned rescue workers or forensic scientists pause when encountering scenes like these.

“If spontaneous combustion was really happening by some mysterious force, we’d expect far more cases. I lean towards the practical, straightforward explanation.”